Why does the Scala programming language failed to break through till nowadays?
20% (1) | The Scala language is too complex for the average programmer. | |
---|---|---|
0% (0) | Too numerous breaks to backward compatibility. | |
20% (1) | Its just not accepted enough and its not sure if it will survive. | |
0% (0) | There aren't enough librarys and frameworks to work with. | |
0% (0) | The work of the language developers weren't good enough. | |
40% (2) | The IDE's aren't good enough for Scala. | |
20% (1) | The Scala language is not well known yet. | |
20% (1) | Companies change to Scala would cost too much. | |
0% (0) | There is simple no need for the language Scala and it's features. | |
20% (1) | There is a little break through and stackoverflow's data isn't representative. | |
40% (2) | The number of questions at stackoverflow don't say nothing about quality and java questions are often from beginners. | |
0% (0) | Other reason. |
5 voters have answered this question.
This poll was created on 2013-12-13 12:42:37
by Falk