Punishment For Rape

In my poll, I asked about the age at which a male rapist should reach before it is acceptable to castrate him or remove his $%!@.

I personally feel that if a boy is old enough to rape, he is old enough to have his balls/$%!@ removed.

What are the thoughts of others here?

If you believe as I do that the victim should be permitted to participate in the torture/removal to any extent she wishes, what age should the female victim be before being permitted to participate?

Tammy

This is a very good question and I hope more women will post their ideas on the subject.

I agree with you 100%, Tammy. If a male rapes a woman/girl he should be subject to punishment regardless of his age. If an exception is made because the male is under a certain age, say, 18 or 21, it would be like giving them a license to rape until they reach the specified age.

There are at least three good reasons to remove a rapist's $%!@ and/or testicles. The first reason is prevention. Any male who has raped once will rape again, unless his ability to do so is removed. This is all the more true of younger rapists. If a boy of 12 or 13 rapes a girl and gets away with it, what vile acts would he be capable of when he is older? The second reason is to deter other would-be rapists. A male, whatever his age, is more likely to think twice about performing rape if he knows that he will loose his $%!@ and/or testicles. Teenage boys are not known for thinking through the results of their actions. That is why punishment for rape should be as painful and as public as possible... There is no other way of getting through to them. The third reason for severe punishment is to help the rape victim recover from the trauma she has suffered. Seeing her attacker properly punished for his crime, or, better yet, participating in his punishment, would be a big help in finding some closure to the torment she has suffered. This, too, would be the case regardless of the age of the rapist.

You ask if the victim should be permitted to participate in the punishment of her attacker to any extent she wishes... The answer to that is a resounding yes! As far as what age the female victim should be before being permitted to participate, I suppose that would vary some. In general, I would say that any girl aged twelve or more should be able to deal with the situation. Depending on their level of maturity, some younger girls might be able to participate, while some over that age might not be able to handle it. This would have to be assessed on a case by case basis. It would be a good idea for younger victims to be accompanied by their mother, aunt, older sister, or other suitable female relative, both for moral support, and to help with the punishment.

Whatever the age of the victim, it would seem like it would be a good idea for there to be some sort of training session, where victims could view videos of other punishment sessions and learn the various techniques which could be chosen. It would also seem like a good idea to have a professionally trained castration nurse to help or give advice as needed, as well as being there to properly do the job if the victim should loose her nerve at the last moment. There would, of course, be a need for such nurses anyway, for those cases where, for whatever reasons, the victim does not choose to participate.

Just a couple of final comments related to this subject...

There is considerable difference of opinion concerning whether removing the testicles, the $%!@, or both would be the best punishment for rape. As satisfying as it might be to slowly crush a rapists testicles, I still believe that the most severe punishment would be to remove the $%!@, as painfully as possible, but to leave the rapist's testicles intact. This would sentence the rapist to a lifetime of frustration, being unable to ever have sex again, or even find any relief through $%!@ion... This would be especially true with teenage boys, whose raging hormones would make this situation an agonizing torment. Besides which, their testicles would be availible for further torture, as necessary.

It is an unfortunate fact that rapists, as well as their victims, seem to be getting younger and younger. There was a case recently where a 12 year old boy raped and sodomised a 10 year old girl! Unbeliveable, but sadly true. This trend MUST be stopped, and swift and severe punishment for rapists, regardless of their age, is the only answer.

Thanks again, Tammy, for providing a forum for the discussion of these matters.

Meri

========== In Reply To ========== In my poll, I asked about the age at which a male rapist should reach before it is acceptable to castrate him or remove his $%!@.

I personally feel that if a boy is old enough to rape, he is old enough to have his balls/$%!@ removed.

What are the thoughts of others here?

If you believe as I do that the victim should be permitted to participate in the torture/removal to any extent she wishes, what age should the female victim be before being permitted to participate?

Tammy

There are at least three good reasons to remove a rapist's $%!@ and/or testicles. The first reason is prevention. Any male who has raped once will rape again, unless his ability to do so is removed. This is all the more true of younger rapists. If a boy of 12 or 13 rapes a girl and gets away with it, what vile acts would he be capable of when he is older?

I agree Meri. I think that any man/boy who rapes should receive the same punishment.

The second reason is to deter other would-be rapists. A male, whatever his age, is more likely to think twice about performing rape if he knows that he will loose his $%!@ and/or testicles. Teenage boys are not known for thinking through the results of their actions. That is why punishment for rape should be as painful and as public as possible... There is no other way of getting through to them.

Absolutely! If other boys don't consider the ramifications of their violent actions, than perhaps watching a similar aged boy getting his weiner cut off would desuade them.

The third reason for severe punishment is to help the rape victim recover from the trauma she has suffered. Seeing her attacker properly punished for his crime, or, better yet, participating in his punishment, would be a big help in finding some closure to the torment she has suffered. This, too, would be the case regardless of the age of the rapist.

This is one of the most important reasons for doing this.

You ask if the victim should be permitted to participate in the punishment of her attacker to any extent she wishes... The answer to that is a resounding yes! As far as what age the female victim should be before being permitted to participate, I suppose that would vary some. In general, I would say that any girl aged twelve or more should be able to deal with the situation. Depending on their level of maturity, some younger girls might be able to participate, while some over that age might not be able to handle it. This would have to be assessed on a case by case basis. It would be a good idea for younger victims to be accompanied by their mother, aunt, older sister, or other suitable female relative, both for moral support, and to help with the punishment.

I think that if the girl is too young to physically participate, than she should be assisted by her mother, sister, aunt or other woman. At the very least, the girl should be allowed to view the punishment from a close proximity.

There is considerable difference of opinion concerning whether removing the testicles, the $%!@, or both would be the best punishment for rape. As satisfying as it might be to slowly crush a rapists testicles, I still believe that the most severe punishment would be to remove the $%!@, as painfully as possible, but to leave the rapist's testicles intact. This would sentence the rapist to a lifetime of frustration, being unable to ever have sex again, or even find any relief through $%!@ion... This would be especially true with teenage boys, whose raging hormones would make this situation an agonizing torment. Besides which, their testicles would be availible for further torture, as necessary.

I agree! I maintain that removing the weiner(I use this word as I don't think it will be censored) is the best and most suitable punishment. As you say, he cannot seek sexual gratification ever again. As well, like you said, he still has his testicles available for further punishment.

It is an unfortunate fact that rapists, as well as their victims, seem to be getting younger and younger. There was a case recently where a 12 year old boy raped and sodomised a 10 year old girl! Unbeliveable, but sadly true. This trend MUST be stopped, and swift and severe punishment for rapists, regardless of their age, is the only answer.

I know what you mean. I remember a case near where I live about 5 years ago, where two boys aged 11 raped a 6 year old girl. What do you think would be a suitable punishment for these young boys? Do you feel as I do that they would deserve to have their weiners cut off? Should they be punished beforehand?

Tammy

how the hell is a man suppose to be if you cut off his $%!@. if you do he will die of his bladder bursting. DUH. have you ever thought of that ========== In Reply To ========== This is a very good question and I hope more women will post their ideas on the subject.

I agree with you 100%, Tammy. If a male rapes a woman/girl he should be subject to punishment regardless of his age. If an exception is made because the male is under a certain age, say, 18 or 21, it would be like giving them a license to rape until they reach the specified age.

There are at least three good reasons to remove a rapist's $%!@ and/or testicles. The first reason is prevention. Any male who has raped once will rape again, unless his ability to do so is removed. This is all the more true of younger rapists. If a boy of 12 or 13 rapes a girl and gets away with it, what vile acts would he be capable of when he is older? The second reason is to deter other would-be rapists. A male, whatever his age, is more likely to think twice about performing rape if he knows that he will loose his $%!@ and/or testicles. Teenage boys are not known for thinking through the results of their actions. That is why punishment for rape should be as painful and as public as possible... There is no other way of getting through to them. The third reason for severe punishment is to help the rape victim recover from the trauma she has suffered. Seeing her attacker properly punished for his crime, or, better yet, participating in his punishment, would be a big help in finding some closure to the torment she has suffered. This, too, would be the case regardless of the age of the rapist.

You ask if the victim should be permitted to participate in the punishment of her attacker to any extent she wishes... The answer to that is a resounding yes! As far as what age the female victim should be before being permitted to participate, I suppose that would vary some. In general, I would say that any girl aged twelve or more should be able to deal with the situation. Depending on their level of maturity, some younger girls might be able to participate, while some over that age might not be able to handle it. This would have to be assessed on a case by case basis. It would be a good idea for younger victims to be accompanied by their mother, aunt, older sister, or other suitable female relative, both for moral support, and to help with the punishment.

Whatever the age of the victim, it would seem like it would be a good idea for there to be some sort of training session, where victims could view videos of other punishment sessions and learn the various techniques which could be chosen. It would also seem like a good idea to have a professionally trained castration nurse to help or give advice as needed, as well as being there to properly do the job if the victim should loose her nerve at the last moment. There would, of course, be a need for such nurses anyway, for those cases where, for whatever reasons, the victim does not choose to participate.

Just a couple of final comments related to this subject...

There is considerable difference of opinion concerning whether removing the testicles, the $%!@, or both would be the best punishment for rape. As satisfying as it might be to slowly crush a rapists testicles, I still believe that the most severe punishment would be to remove the $%!@, as painfully as possible, but to leave the rapist's testicles intact. This would sentence the rapist to a lifetime of frustration, being unable to ever have sex again, or even find any relief through $%!@ion... This would be especially true with teenage boys, whose raging hormones would make this situation an agonizing torment. Besides which, their testicles would be availible for further torture, as necessary.

It is an unfortunate fact that rapists, as well as their victims, seem to be getting younger and younger. There was a case recently where a 12 year old boy raped and sodomised a 10 year old girl! Unbeliveable, but sadly true. This trend MUST be stopped, and swift and severe punishment for rapists, regardless of their age, is the only answer.

Thanks again, Tammy, for providing a forum for the discussion of these matters.

Meri

I ment pee ========== In Reply To ========== how the hell is a man suppose to be if you cut off his $%!@. if you do he will die of his bladder bursting. DUH. have you ever thought of that