Welcome! Sign in to access your account. New user?

User: viperco1



Click through to message forum for reply and admin options.
Posted in Executions For What? on 2009-06-06 23:36:56

murder=killing an innocent, ignoring fair trial, or making some pay more after they served their sentence execution=took every possible step to make sure they weren't innocent and is within the law thus not falling into the danger of anarchy

Posted in Executions For What? on 2009-06-06 23:32:05

a murderer is of no worth, and their take on human life is twisted and should be removed before they corrupt others, also survival is instinctual so executions will decrease murders especially if they're treated inhumanely until execution (feed enough for organs to be useful to someone else, stripped of clothing, ignored)

Posted in Executions For What? on 2009-06-06 23:24:52

She killed when she wasn't in IMMEDIATE danger so kill her, she should have called the cops. As you said about the cops needing to execute abusers i agree, in fact on all violent crimes (can't live in civilised society so permanently remove them), political corruption (their descisions need to be pure because they affect everyone), and for being predujuces based on birth (race, gender, class: they are willing to oppenly take away others rights based on things outside of their control and thus have none themselves, this should be told by being a member of an organization that supports these "values," hate crimes, political activism, and confessions)

Posted in Simple (yes/no) Ethical poll on 2009-05-03 21:06:46

You should add its depends on mental maturity to the sex age questions and individuals have best to the contenant question (i see that as cultural imperialism, and i dont like any currently existing cultures they're all corrupt)

Posted in The Ideal Society -- Controlled By Women on 2008-10-13 03:51:14

Talents are learned not innate. Women can be as skilled as men at administration, ive seen it, and men can suck and enough of your false misgynonist god.