Are you male or female?
91% (1995) | Male | |
---|---|---|
8% (183) | Female |
2178 voters have answered this question.
How old are you?
28% (617) | 13-16 | |
---|---|---|
22% (493) | 17-20 | |
23% (508) | 21-30 | |
16% (362) | 31-50 | |
8% (174) | 51+ |
2154 voters have answered this question.
If male, are you circumcised?
80% (1654) | Yes | |
---|---|---|
19% (395) | No | |
0% (3) | Unsure |
2052 voters have answered this question.
If you are circumcised, are you happy or would you prefer to be uncircumcised?
83% (1417) | Happy circumcised | |
---|---|---|
16% (276) | Rather be uncircumcised |
1693 voters have answered this question.
If you are uncircumcised, are you happy to have your foreskin, or would you rather be circumcised
21% (291) | Happy to have foreskin | |
---|---|---|
78% (1035) | Rather be circumcised |
1326 voters have answered this question.
Circumcised males, would you (or did you) have your son(s) circumcised, or would you leave them intact and let them choose when they are old enough?
81% (1368) | Circumcise Son | |
---|---|---|
18% (316) | Leave Son Uncircumcised/Let Him Choose Later |
1684 voters have answered this question.
Uncircumcised males, would you (or did you) have your son(s) circumcised, or would you leave them intact and let them choose when they are old enough?
78% (1047) | Circumcise Son | |
---|---|---|
21% (289) | Leave Son Uncircumcised/Let Him Choose Later |
1336 voters have answered this question.
Females, would you (or did you) have your son(s) circumcised, or would you leave them intact and let them choose when they are old enough?
90% (1052) | Circumcise Son | |
---|---|---|
9% (113) | Leave Son Intact/Let Him Choose Later |
1165 voters have answered this question.
Should non-religious circumcision of babies be made illegal in the United States unless there is a medical necessity?
19% (379) | Yes, make non-religious circumcision of babies illegal unless there is a urgent medical need | |
---|---|---|
80% (1592) | No, parents have the right to decide whether their son should be circumcised |
1971 voters have answered this question.
Except in a medical emergency, should a parent be allowed to circumcise a child (ages 5-17) without his consent?
3% (68) | Yes, but only for religious reasons | |
---|---|---|
74% (1496) | Yes, the parent can circumcise the son for any reason (looks, tradition, supposed hygein) as long as | |
21% (432) | No, children above age 5 can make decisions about removing part of their body for themselves. |
1996 voters have answered this question.
If you would circumcise your son (at birth or as a child) without his consent, check all reasons you would do this.
87% (1442) | You like the appearance | |
---|---|---|
80% (1324) | You think it will feel better | |
76% (1247) | You are circumcised | |
3% (61) | Your religion requires it | |
90% (1491) | You think its cleaner | |
83% (1364) | You think girls will like it | |
71% (1166) | You don't want him to be made fun of in school | |
88% (1454) | You think its healthier | |
56% (931) | Other |
1639 voters have answered this question.
If you would not have your son circumcised, check all the reasons you would leave him intact.
85% (457) | Foreskins are natural | |
---|---|---|
54% (292) | You think it looks better | |
72% (385) | You want him to have more sensitivity | |
41% (221) | Your are uncircumcised and happy | |
38% (207) | Its the trend of the future | |
82% (437) | Its his body to live with, not yours | |
66% (352) | You don't want him to suffer the pain of having his foreskin cut off | |
21% (113) | Girls prefer a foreskin | |
20% (109) | Other |
532 voters have answered this question.