Welcome! Sign in to access your account. New user?

Circumcise Your Son?

Looking for the old results?
In the United States, babies are routinely circumcised, despite the fact that there is no medical reason to permanently remove an important part of the boy's genitals. This deals with your opinion on circumcising baby boys and whether or not it should be legal,

Are you male or female?

91% (1995) Male
8% (183) Female

2178 voters have answered this question.

How old are you?

28% (617) 13-16
22% (493) 17-20
23% (508) 21-30
16% (362) 31-50
8% (174) 51+

2154 voters have answered this question.

If male, are you circumcised?

80% (1654) Yes
19% (395) No
0% (3) Unsure

2052 voters have answered this question.

If you are circumcised, are you happy or would you prefer to be uncircumcised?

83% (1417) Happy circumcised
16% (276) Rather be uncircumcised

1693 voters have answered this question.

If you are uncircumcised, are you happy to have your foreskin, or would you rather be circumcised

21% (291) Happy to have foreskin
78% (1035) Rather be circumcised

1326 voters have answered this question.

Circumcised males, would you (or did you) have your son(s) circumcised, or would you leave them intact and let them choose when they are old enough?

81% (1368) Circumcise Son
18% (316) Leave Son Uncircumcised/Let Him Choose Later

1684 voters have answered this question.

Uncircumcised males, would you (or did you) have your son(s) circumcised, or would you leave them intact and let them choose when they are old enough?

78% (1047) Circumcise Son
21% (289) Leave Son Uncircumcised/Let Him Choose Later

1336 voters have answered this question.

Females, would you (or did you) have your son(s) circumcised, or would you leave them intact and let them choose when they are old enough?

90% (1052) Circumcise Son
9% (113) Leave Son Intact/Let Him Choose Later

1165 voters have answered this question.

Should non-religious circumcision of babies be made illegal in the United States unless there is a medical necessity?

19% (379) Yes, make non-religious circumcision of babies illegal unless there is a urgent medical need
80% (1592) No, parents have the right to decide whether their son should be circumcised

1971 voters have answered this question.

Except in a medical emergency, should a parent be allowed to circumcise a child (ages 5-17) without his consent?

3% (68) Yes, but only for religious reasons
74% (1496) Yes, the parent can circumcise the son for any reason (looks, tradition, supposed hygein) as long as
21% (432) No, children above age 5 can make decisions about removing part of their body for themselves.

1996 voters have answered this question.

If you would circumcise your son (at birth or as a child) without his consent, check all reasons you would do this.

87% (1442) You like the appearance
80% (1324) You think it will feel better
76% (1247) You are circumcised
3% (61) Your religion requires it
90% (1491) You think its cleaner
83% (1364) You think girls will like it
71% (1166) You don't want him to be made fun of in school
88% (1454) You think its healthier
56% (931) Other

1639 voters have answered this question.

If you would not have your son circumcised, check all the reasons you would leave him intact.

85% (457) Foreskins are natural
54% (292) You think it looks better
72% (385) You want him to have more sensitivity
41% (221) Your are uncircumcised and happy
38% (207) Its the trend of the future
82% (437) Its his body to live with, not yours
66% (352) You don't want him to suffer the pain of having his foreskin cut off
21% (113) Girls prefer a foreskin
20% (109) Other

532 voters have answered this question.

This poll was created on 2004-03-10 06:41:26 by coolguy30
Next Poll
Back to Category