User: barbirolli
) |
| 2014-03-08 | |
| 0 | |
| 10 | |
| 2 |
Click through to message forum for reply and admin options.
Posted in
Naked School
on 2016-07-21 17:51:39
In all seriousness, I am quite surprised that no such thing exists. There are plenty of naturists about, and I am sure that in principle they would like their children to be brought up at a school in which naturist principles and practice were observed and encouraged. The snag for the fantasists is that I would expect such an establishment would be just about as sexually discharged as you could imagine. If nudity is normal, it isn't titillating.
Posted in
would you let your son swim nude.
on 2016-07-21 16:23:08
My reasoning was similar, but besides, at 18, people are adults and don't need their parent's permission to do anything, at least in the UK.
Posted in
Men only swims
on 2014-11-07 19:39:09
"I don't think that pedophiles are going to abuse anyone in an open group situation. This is usually done in a private one to one situation. In fact most child abuse is done in homes or by relatives. I don't remember any abuse when boys and men used to swim nude and shower together."
Quite right, Barry123. In a public changing room, there is usually no danger of abuse, or grooming, come to that. Such activity would be picked up immediately and reported. A changing room is usually among the safest places, and nudity there is still widespread in consequence, at least in the UK. Logically, there should be no ground for objection to nude swimming in a single-sex environment.
Personally, I agree with mixed nude swimming, but different arguments apply to that.
Posted in
Surrveillance and spying on citizenz by security agencies
on 2014-06-27 20:39:44
UK citizens should note the revelation that our security services can intercept communications sent to other UK citizens without warrant, if those citizens are foolish enough to use foreign channels to communicate with each other, because, by using those foreign channels, such communications become "external" for the purposes of the relevant Act of Parliament and therefore are not protected by domestic safeguards against unauthorized surveillance.
"Foreign channels" of course includes anything American, such as Google, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, Microsoft, etc.. etc., etc.
Privacy? Forget it!
Posted in
Surrveillance and spying on citizenz by security agencies
on 2014-06-27 20:26:17
Actually, let's get it right for once: "...Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupt absolutely".
