User: Tulio

Dragonfire,

Maybe this comparison between men dying in war and women being killed by their husbands has no regard for those biggest wars. On the other hand, if we consider the average number of men dying in all conflicts that happen, including those three wars you mentioned, it may make sense to say that the number of women dying at their husband's hands is greater, because I think that in most wars, the death rate of soldiers is very smaller than that in the two world war.

Only one example: I read that in one year, about 10,000 women were killed by their husbands in Russia, whereas 14,000 people died in the war between USSR and Afghanistan, which lasted for 10 years.

Men and women really have their troubles, but the number of women that are killed by their husbands is normally greater than the number of men who are killed in war. Men suffer because of their enemies and women suffer because of their companions. I don't want women to put opression on us men, but it is inadmissible that so many women die because of those who should give them all the love.

First I wanna tell you all that I am a man, and not a woman. I have to admit I was a little hallucinated when I wrote those words. I exaggerated in some points. Probably, all the message is a big hallucination. However I see no point for people to call me names, but I forgive the one who did it.

ma2r2

I've read about a research in which they analysed a group of men and a group of women working out for eight weeks. In this period, the women's muscular gain was bigger than the men's one. This may be why you have seen trained girls overcoming trained boys in tug of war matches. I cannot show the text about that research because it is in Portuguese.

Those numbers were taken from the current results of this poll. In each product, the first factor is the biceps size in inches, and the second factor is the porcentage of people who voted in the option of such size. Then I calculated an average.