User: Mr.Allan

It's very important for both spouses to be in agreement about incorporating domestic discipline into their marriage. If they are, then a husband should receive permission from his wife to administer spankings only when he feels they are necessary to help her correct bad behavior. The goal is to reach a point where spankings are never necessary because a wife has learned how to behave in such a way as to never deserve them.

The exception to this might be when a couple agrees on the value of maintenance spankings, in which case a husband may administer regular spankings if he and his wife both feel that they would be helpful for her in maintaining her already-good behavior.

I'm of the opinion that the best role a woman can adopt in life is that of a devoted wife and mother. As a wife, she'll become her husband's support and helpmate and will be committed to taking care of as many of his needs and desires as she can.

As a mother, she'll work to maintain a happy and peaceful home for her family and will set a good example for her children as to what a submissive and feminine woman should be when she happily obeys their father and follows his leadership, allowing him to act as the Head of Household and make all of the important and necessary decisions for the family.

And amongst those who are already comfortable being nude around each other, I don't think it's likely that anybody would be bothered by casual and open peeing as long as it's done in a sanitary way. Same principle would apply to peeing freely anywhere, not just the beach.

As for sections of beaches for different behavior, I've definitely read of that being done in unofficial capacities. Some clothing optional beaches naturally segregate into areas of clothes and areas of nudity, whereas some nude beaches segregate into areas of simple nudity and areas of more "adult" behavior. The beaches don't set things up this way but visitors just sort of divide the sections on their own.

I think there may also be a cultural difference is what might be considered "short" or "long" hair when you compare Biblical times with modern times. It's possible that shoulder-length hair would have been considered short for a man, and hair extending to the mid or lower back would have been considered long for a woman. I'm certainly aware of Paul's penchant for metaphors, though Jesus Himself used them more often, however after reading this chapter of Scripture as a whole I don't think Paul was speaking metaphorically.

Basically, in this section he was writing about proper ways to worship. He extoled the virtues of a woman's long hair as being a "natural covering" for her head during worship meetings because some Christians were unsure of whether women should cover her heads as they had in the past and Paul was stating that female hair serves as a natural cover. At the same time, he pointed out that men do not require such a cover for worshipping and that a man attempting to cover himself (such as by having long hair for this reason) would be acting improperly.

I don't think this verse should be taken to mean that men CAN'T have longer hair or that women CAN'T have shorter hair. I think there are cultural and personal preferences that should influence this decision and Paul was mainly referring to proper practice during church gatherings and the fact that he believed women should still cover their heads for worship and that men should not.

Still, I agree with the message of long hair being a glory to women and that's why I shared the verse. I don't think it's necessary and I think certain short styles can be cute, too, but I associate long hair on a woman with her natural feminine beauty.

Males and females are equal in the sight of God and deserve the same societal rights, opportunities, and privileges. However, there are gender differences that should be recognized and celebrated rather than hidden or diminished.

Males are stronger, more capable of shouldering emotional burdens, more inclined to act as providers, and more inclined to act as leaders in a relationship. Females are more capable of empathy, better at caregiving, capable of bringing forth life into the world, more inclined to serve as helpmates in a relationship, and more physically beautiful.

Instead of following modern trends that seek to destroy traditional gender roles, such as radical feminism, we should be making efforts to encourage traditional gender roles and enjoy the natural strengths that both genders possess. I support males being masculine and dominant and females being feminine and submissive.