User: dirtgirl

Though the majority of physical punishment in this family is $%!@-penetrative and purgative, we have rarely (as in about once a year if that) administered $%!@spankings to my little second-cousin. (We being her mother and I). Wooden spoon or spatula. Screams, tears, fear, one little girl who has been very definitely "humbled".

In adulthood as well as childhood, aberrant/abhorrent behavior can often be traced back to constipation, and colo-rectal auto-intoxication affecting the brain. So spanking of any kind doesn't tackle the root of the problem, but there are two things that tackle it: enema punishment - and the kind of $%!@ rape punishment that has the effect of literally $%!@ing the s.h.i.t out of them (giving a $%!@/dildo suppository)

Sandpaper on the genitals sounds horrid, I imagine days and even weeks of continual soreness and sensitivity after a sanding punishment. But that's the point. Severe physical punishment for repeated and/or grave misdeeds = dramatic reassertion of adult power. And a major deterrent. Only thing is, if the adults want to tackle root causes of aberrant behavior in their younglings, genital punishment doesn't achieve anything...you all know my recommendation.

FOR THOSE WHO DIDN'T READ CLOSELY: The "can't vote" questions are immediately duplicated in votable form. TO AWAYNESS ET AL: To claim that there's "nothing we can do about it except hit them [whatever "hit" means in this context!]" is an abdication of one's humanity and sanity, and an insult to/denial of other people's. When these people (if they can be considered as human!) demand and get any measure of power, we must recognize it as a declaration of war on the rest of the world by a self-appointed elite, and respond by giving them the "war" they so crave...I think you take my meaning.

AIRGOD, either you endorse the criminalization of every doctor who ever gave an enema, suppository or rectal thermometer to a child, or you accept that your Definition #2 is complete and utter $%!@. (And if it's on the statute books, it's null and void for being based on a false premise).

There are some words you just don't stretch the meaning of - and two of them are:

"rape" (it can only mean violent penetration with a $%!@ or dildo, because non-violent "manipulation" of a person into "sex" is not "assault" except in the minds of the dangerously-mentally-abnormal, especially those infected by the poison of religion); and

"sexual organ" (by simple logic it can only mean "genital"). That is why we used to, in slightly more sensible times, have in law separate offences for things with "buggery without consent".